Best, Bottoms, Switches: One Final Check The Research Information | Autostraddle

Hello and thanks for visiting the last quest into the annals of data obtained by myself, away from you, regarding your thoughts regarding the sexual conditions top / bottom / switch. We have already talked about:

Now we are going to look at the study responses all together, and exactly how many other identities, methods, lifestyle conditions and interactions intersect making use of the identities I made the decision to actually really demolish over the past few months.

Only a Reminder

One final time with feeling, this is how the numbers shook down:

Evaluating All Of The Information

Gender Acts

We’ve destroyed interest in numerous gender acts by sexual identity in earlier articles. Here is what the entire group is actually into:

Notably, despite there being a little even more soles than clothes within our group, y’all would rather provide things above accept all of them almost across-the-board — unless it requires getting your mouth or finger in someone’s asshole, where point you’d rather have somebody take action for you than do it to a person! Interesting.

Intimate Frequency

Survey-takers had been expected “Within the past half a year, how many times maybe you’ve, on average, had intercourse?” This is how that ended up:

When it comes to “Other/Complicated” option, survey-takers happened to be expected to describe their own scenario. We experience those and pulled all the people that have been about long-distance relationships making that into its very own classification, plus pulled responses that did consist of a certain measure of sexual regularity and included those for their respective categories. In advance of performing this, around 10per cent of participants chose Other/Complicated, generally because they believed just choosing one of several provided responses didn’t inform the entire story. Irrespective of long-distance people explaining periods of everyday sex alternating by durations of no intercourse, the most frequent conditions mentioned right here had been folks in uncharacteristic dried out means because surgical procedure, ailment, depression or using anti-depressants.

There clearly wasn’t any significant relationship between top/bottom/switch identification and exactly how typically you may have sex. Actually, in addition to in a relationship or otherwise not, maybe not a great deal impacted how many times you reported making love in a statistically significant means. Although
the majority of research shows opposite-sex partners have sex more frequently than same-sex female partners
, the queers on the survey who were matchmaking guys happened to be having sex at nearly the same rates as those dating females.

In addition keeping also pace together? Those in monogamous and non-monogamous interactions, in line
because of the outcomes of all of our 2015 Lesbian Intercourse Survey
. We cannot truly examine the 2 surveys since they had been two split self-selected samples, nevertheless ended up being interesting that 2018 group seemed to be desiring

and

having method significantly less sex in general as compared to 2015 class. Probably as a result of existential fear!

Intimate Experience and Positioning

Tops had a tendency to experienced a lot more lifetime sexual partners compared to the some other teams. 19percent of covers have actually ridden the hobby horse with over ten ladies and 8percent with over 20, when compared to 9% and 3% for bottoms and 16per cent and 5per cent for changes.

Tops happened to be also the smallest amount of more likely to have acquired intercourse with one — 43percent haven’t, versus 37% of bottoms and 33% of changes.

Sexual Orientation

Listed here is the basic breakdown of the class by intimate positioning:

Some mentioned correlations:

• 65percent of Pansexuals identify as switches, compared to 51% with the whole team and 50per cent of lesbians and bisexuals.
• 51.5% of surfaces identify as lesbians, versus 44per cent of soles and 42percent of changes.
• 19per cent of bisexuals determine as soles, when compared to 14% associated with whole team.
• 15per cent of lesbians and 18percent of gay men and women defined as tops, when compared to 8.6percent of bisexuals, 7per cent of pansexuals, 11per cent of queers and 12% on the entire party.

Gender Personality and Presentation

Discover exactly how y’all feel about your own gender nowadays:

As
talked about within blog post on surfaces
, our review unveiled your “masculine lover = top” and “feminine lover = bottom” stereotype (which had been, in older times, a total directive) has a lot of fact to it, however it undoubtedly cannot be applied across-the-board.

Around 8% of the which identified as high femme or difficult femme defined as covers, versus 12percent for the entire team. Around 8% of gentle butches and masculine-of-center folks identified as bottoms, compared to 14per cent of most survey-takers.

“Switch” was, without a doubt, widely known identity for every groups, with between 50 and 60 percent aligning on their own with switchiness — the actual only real sex presentation with significantly less than 50 per cent getting switch-aligned ended up being butches, who simply missed the level at 49percent. Tomboy femmes nearly tipped the level for the other direction although not rather — 59percent are prone to switching it. But, as mentioned in the tops blog post, its never secure to presume exactly what someone’s into centered on their particular sex demonstration.

Numerous butches and femmes quoted during the surfaces blog post shown stress which they happened to be thought getting a high or bottom part for their sex presentation.

We also found some variances within gender identity and trans position as well — like that trans women were the most likely to spot as bottoms. Non-binary/genderqueer males happened to be almost certainly to identify as covers, but all of our trial size for that class (16) had been too tiny to attract any significant results.

In addition seems that non-binary/genderqueer ladies happened to be likely to recognize as switches, and agender individuals were probably to “not very positive.” Maybe you will find a complete correlation between becoming changes and determining with language that some might give consideration to oxymoronic, like “tomboy femme” and “non-binary girl.”

Geography – International

69% of survey participants originated from the U.S. and 31percent were beyond your U.S.. There had been somewhat more Europeans distinguishing as “none regarding the preceding” (17.6per cent, compared to 13% men and women in U.S. and 11% of Canadians). “My home is Europe, function in French (and Dutch), as well as some cause “top”, “bottom” and “switch” listed here are primarily applied to sexual experiences between two male-identified people,” penned one European, although as reasonable, lots of Us americans encountered the exact same effect.

“Really don’t feel the need to put on classes,” blogged another. “I think the tense and excludes possiblity to encounter without producing an entire big deal from the jawhorse and panders to stockbuilding (as happens with kinds of identification). But i realize this is apparently very something during the US.”

We just had 109 survey-takers around australia, however if that class is consultant I then would want to provide a tip associated with hat for the area down under and all of my friends and family just who reside indeed there, you have evaded the alleged leading shortage afflicting this country with an extraordinary 16.5% tops / 5.5per cent soles proportion.

Asia and Canada had similar amounts of people pinpointing by using these terms just like the U.S., and now we did not have adequate participants in south usa, Africa or Mexico to draw significant results.

Geography – U.S.

83per cent of study respondents stayed in a city or major metro region and 17.25per cent in rural areas. We offered U.S. residents a choice of indicating should they lived in nine specific cities/metro areas, if not they can say “i actually do maybe not live-in some of these towns and cities or metro locations, but i really do live-in a city/major metro area” or “i really do not reside in an urban area or metro place.”

Plenty commenters chimed directly into highlight the nine cities we included were NOT the biggest metropolitan areas within country or perhaps the a lot of LGBT-populated towns and cities. This is definitely proper. In interest of full disclosure: we now have an author performing an item about those types of nine towns therefore wanted to gather information about that city especially, it felt weird to only inquire about one city, so we threw in eight other people more or less off of the covers of our minds: nyc, San Francisco/Bay Area, la, Chicago, Atlanta, Boston, Minneapolis/St.Paul, Portland and Seattle.

Merely 21 participants were from Atlanta, a sample size too small for evaluation. Therefore weare looking at those eight places along with other unlabeled city-dwellers (that we included Atlanta individuals) and non-city folks. So you can organize the cereals of sodium appropriately, here are the wide range of responses I had from each city: Portland, otherwise – 63, Los Angeles – 96, New York – 212, Chicago – 85, Seattle – 91, San Francisco/Bay Region – 124, Minneapolis/St.Paul – 53, Boston – 101.

This data turned into very fascinating and today I wish we’d asked about even more locations! When it comes down to purposes of this analysis,

We cut-out the “I’m not sure” category

, because SurveyMonkey said we did not have enough men and women choosing that option for mathematically considerable results.

Being compare city-specific information into general information, after that, the overall numbers for your team making use of the “I am not sure”s eliminated are: leading (14percent), Bottom (15percent), Switch (56.6percent), None from the Above (14.5percent)

• 
  Finest percentage of surfaces:
  
  La (22per cent), ny (17.4%), non-city/metro-areas (16.2per cent).
• 
  Cheapest percentage of clothes:
  
  San Francisco/Bay Region (7percent), Boston (9.7percent), Portland (10.2%)

To the tops during the non-city/metro places, a “top lack” principle we penned straight down in my laptop was actually “ALL THE BEST HAVE BEEN IN THE WOODS / REGARDING FARM?” You know in which else the clothes tend to be? On 405 or looking to get a seat on the L practice at the Bedford stop during rush-hour.

• 
  Finest percentage of bottoms:
  
  Minneapolis/St.Paul (24per cent), Boston (19per cent), Los Angeles (17.4percent)
• 
  Best portion of bottoms:
  
  San Francisco/Bay Area (12.4%), New York (13.3per cent), Portland (13.6%)

It seems the soles are on 405 and several are increasingly being beneficial service-oriented next-door neighbors their man Midwesterners.

• 
  Highest portion of switches:
  
  Portland (66%), San Francisco/Bay Region (60per cent), Seattle (55.6per cent)

Portland is DTF, y’all, and very happy to change it so that you can suit your needs!

• 
  Highest percentage of “nothing associated with Above”:
  
  San Francisco/Bay Neighborhood (19.3per cent), Minneapolis/St.Paul (19.15percent), Chicago (17percent)

People of bay area want to blaze their damn trails.

What about kink?

• 
  Cities with kink-identified individuals:
  
  San Francisco/Bay Area (29.5%), Minneapolis (25.5%), L. A. (25.5%)
• 
  Cities with the most people who are possibly kinky
  
  or
  
  down for perverted casual sex seattle
  
  Seattle (87%), Minneapolis (83percent), Portland (80%)

If there is something particular you had been interested in based on the data I accumulated or the open-answer concerns we asked, let me know inside the remarks of course feasible, I am able to deal with all of them in the next post!